Why Our Clients Win More Often

At MyConsulting, we don't just submit compliant tenders — we engineer responses that score higher and win more often.
More than 50% of our clients return for repeat bids, while new walk-ins continue to grow through referrals and reputation.

Whether you're a small business bidding for the first time or a seasoned contractor aiming for multimillion-dollar panels, our tender writing services are designed to deliver measurable results, not just documents.

Our approach is different. We lead the tendering process, manage content development end-to-end, and write responses that speak the evaluator's language — clearly, confidently, and with proof.

What Sets Us Apart?

• Strategy-first writing — built around the scoring matrix
• Persuasive content that proves your capability, not just describes it
• Compliance + credibility — every response aligns with procurement standards and client expectations
• Full lifecycle support — from review and planning to submission and lodgement

We Write Like Evaluators Think

Most tenders are evaluated against weighted criteria — not guesswork.

Our process starts by reverse-engineering your RFT or RFQ. We:

• Identify the evaluation criteria and scoring breakdown
• Map your business strengths against what the client values
• Highlight evidence to back every claim
• Use clear structure and persuasive writing to make it easy to assess

The result? A response that is scoreable, targeted, and confident.

No Guesswork. Just Results.

We've helped clients across Australia increase their evaluation scores — often winning work against cheaper competitors because their submission was stronger, clearer, and more compelling.

Our process includes:

• Initial discovery and strategy planning
• Full writing and formatting
• CVs, project examples, policies and attachments
• Final submission review and portal assistance

Real Clients. Real Outcomes.

• Construction contractor (QLD): Scored 92% on quality criteria and secured a $10M infrastructure upgrade contract
• Plumbing company (VIC): Successfully awarded 5 competitive tenders across council and education sectors
• Cleaning company (WA): Won a major regional cleaning contract through a Western Australia Government tender
• Electrical subcontractor (WA): Selected for subdivision and drainage works on a government-funded regional infrastructure project
• Earthmoving company (NSW): Appointed to a flood recovery panel for urgent repair works across Northern NSW
• Healthcare supplies provider (VIC): Secured a multi-year government contract for health equipment and consumables

In every case, we provided end-to-end support — from clarifying scope and building methodology, to refining the narrative and aligning every response to the scoring framework. Our clients don't just meet requirements — they outperform competitors on quality and clarity.

We Don't Just Write — We Lead

Writing is only one part of a successful tender. Our job is to take pressure off your internal team, manage the process, and remove the guesswork. You'll know what we're doing, why we're doing it, and what comes next — at every stage.

Our team will:

• Coordinate your key inputs and project examples
• Advise on attachments and policy requirements
• Develop clear and targeted content matched to the RFT
• Assist with submission via VendorPanel, QTenders, BuyNSW, Ariba, and others

Let's Raise the Bar for Your Next Tender

Whether you're submitting a facilities contract, infrastructure panel, or health sector bid — we'll help you lift quality, eliminate risk, and submit a polished, professional response.

We're not here to just tick boxes. We're here to win work.

Contact us today for a no-obligation review of your upcoming tender.

MyConsulting — Tender writing that scores, persuades, and wins.

Understanding Tender Evaluation

We Write for Scores — Not Just Submission

Submitting a compliant tender isn't enough. If you want to win, you need to outscore your competitors — and that's where we come in.

How Tender Scoring Works

Most tenders are evaluated using a weighted scoring model — not just pass/fail checks.

Each section in your submission contributes to your final score:

• Capability and Experience — 30%
• Methodology and Delivery — 25%
• WHS / QA / Environmental — 15%
• Pricing and Value for Money — 30%

If you only meet the basics, you'll receive average scores. But to win, you need to score highly in the technical components — where we focus our attention.

Why Tenderers Lose Points

We've reviewed hundreds of unsuccessful bids. The same issues show up repeatedly:

• Generic or vague responses that don't address the specific question
• Examples that are outdated or irrelevant to the scope
• Copied content reused across multiple submissions
• Missing attachments or incomplete schedules
• Failure to align with every element of the evaluation criteria

Evaluation teams aren't guessing — they're following a scoring system. If your response is unclear, unfocused, or off-topic, you're handing points to your competitors.

Our Response Methodology

At MyConsulting, our goal is to produce responses that achieve the highest possible scores. Here's how we do it:

1. Interpreting the Evaluation Framework

• We break each question into sub-parts and identify:
• The buyer's underlying priorities
• Any compliance triggers or minimum thresholds
• Key terms that match the scoring rubric

2. Leveraging Your Strengths

We don't just ask for input — we identify the areas where your business can score best and use that to shape a tailored, evidence-led strategy.

3. Writing for Evaluators

• We use plain English — no waffle, no filler
• We mirror the structure of the RFT so nothing is missed
• We format responses for clarity — headings, bullets, and callouts
• We label all evidence and align it directly to the criteria

4. Supporting Every Claim with Proof

To score well, you need more than words — you need verification. That includes:

• Relevant projects (recent and aligned to scope)
• Key personnel resumes with relevant project roles
• WHS systems and risk strategies
• Compliance with standards like ISO 9001, 45001, 14001

We help identify the most persuasive material you already have — and package it in a way that delivers impact.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Where You Gain Points

Criteria	Typical Response	What We Deliver
Experience	Generic company profile	Project examples tied to the scope with dates, roles, and outcomes
Methodology	2-paragraph general process	Step-by-step breakdown, site-specific risks and controls
WHS / QA	Policy attached with no context	Integrated commentary + policy + implementation proof
Indigenous Participation	"We will comply"	Defined approach, local engagement plan, tracking method
Environmental	Standard statement	Controls specific to site conditions and work methods

Writing for the Scoring Matrix

Most RFTs contain clear hints about how submissions will be judged — often in the conditions or schedules. We find them and use them to our advantage:

• We mirror the language and structure of the evaluation criteria
• We respond using the same order, weighting, and emphasis as the scoring team
• We write with the assumption that each response is being rated line by line

That's how we help our clients shift from mid-range scores to 90%+ evaluations.

How We Work — And Why It Is Working

At MyConsulting, we don't just write words — we solve problems. We design every tender response to maximise scoring, eliminate risk, and deliver a final submission that is credible, complete, and competitive.

Our clients come to us because they don't want generic templates or fluffy copy. They want results. And that's exactly what we deliver.

What Makes Us Different?

• We work like bid strategists — not just copywriters
• We lead the whole process, not just fill in forms
• We think like evaluators — not salespeople
• We embed proof — not just promises

Let's Show You How

Example 1: From Generic Profile to Scoring Statement

Before: "We have over 15 years' experience and pride ourselves on quality and reliability."

After (by us): "Over the past 5 years, our team has delivered 27 local government drainage upgrades across Western NSW — all completed on time, with zero LTIs, and client sign-off at practical completion."

Why it wins: Specific. Relevant. Evidence-based. The response ties directly to the project scope and shows proven capacity.

Example 2: Rewriting Methodology to Match the Scope

Before: "We follow industry best practice and will complete the works in a professional and timely manner."

After (by us): "Site access will be coordinated with the Council's Works Department. Traffic control plans will be issued 5 business days prior. Pipe installation will be staged in 50m sections to minimise disruption to residents, with reinstatement occurring the same day where possible."

Why it wins: It shows the assessor exactly how you will carry out the job. It includes sequencing, coordination, and consideration for the client and public.

Example 3: Answering Indigenous Participation With a Real Plan

Before: "We support diversity and will meet the IPP where applicable."

After (by us): "We will engage local Indigenous labour via [provider name], whose workforce resides in the area. We've allocated 10% of total site hours to Indigenous participation and will report monthly via the contract dashboard."

Why it wins: It goes beyond policy — it shows a real, trackable commitment. That's what assessors are looking for.

Example 4: Turning a Generic WHS Statement into a Scoring Response

Before: "We have a strong focus on safety and all staff are trained in WHS protocols."

After (by us): "All site personnel will complete daily pre-starts and SWMS aligned with AS/NZS 45001. Toolbox talks will be held every 48 hours, and a dedicated Safety Officer will conduct weekly audits against our internal WHS matrix. Last financial year, we recorded zero reportable incidents across 3 major sites."

Why it wins: The response demonstrates systems, frequency, responsibility, and actual safety outcomes. It aligns with WHS evaluation points and uses measurable language.

Example 5: Upgrading an Environmental Response

Before: "We aim to reduce environmental impact and follow sustainable practices."

After (by us): "Dust suppression will be implemented using water carts during dry works. Materials will be separated onsite for recycling, with concrete and steel sent to certified reclaimers. Our Site Supervisor will complete an Environmental Risk Register and checklist before works commence, in line with ISO 14001 practices."

Why it wins: It doesn't just say the company supports sustainability — it shows exactly how they do it on that job. Includes process, tools, standards and responsibilities.

Example 6: Presenting Company Capability Without the Fluff

Before: "Our company is known for reliability and always going above and beyond."

After (by us): "We currently operate with 14 field staff, 3 project managers, and 2 full-time HSEQ officers. Our fleet includes 6 excavators, 3 tipper combos, and hydro excavation units, all GPS-enabled. In the past 18 months, we've completed 11 council works packages and 4 D&C contracts, with positive client feedback on scope adherence and communication."

Why it wins: It replaces vague compliments with scale, structure, equipment, and performance evidence. That's what gives assessors confidence — not adjectives.

What You Get When You Work With Us

• Scoring-aligned writing — we write the way panels assess
• End-to-end project management — we handle documents, timelines, drafts, feedback, and submission
• Professionally written attachments — including CVs, capability statements, policies, and project sheets
• One clear point of contact — you work directly with a senior consultant, not shuffled across departments

Work With a Team That Writes to Win

If you're tired of underperforming tenders or rushed responses, it's time to try a different approach. We don't just make your bid look better — we make it score better.

Let us review your current submission — no charge — and show you how to improve it.

MyConsulting — Bid Writing. Scoring Strategy. Tender Success.